Made with a lighter midsole and updated mesh upper, the Clifton 9 provides a pleasant feel underfoot throughout the workout. The main principle is maximum shock protection and soft landing
Made with a lighter midsole and updated mesh upper, the Clifton 9 provides a pleasant feel underfoot throughout the workout. The main principle is maximum shock protection and soft landing combined with very low weight.
Made with a lighter midsole and updated mesh upper, the Clifton 9 provides a pleasant feel underfoot throughout the workout. The main principle is maximum shock protection and soft landing combined with very low weight.
Lightweight mesh upper for maximum breathability
Meta-Rocker technology for smoother running
Full-compression EVA midsole provides excellent protection
Outsole designed for a smooth and stable ride with full ground contact
Strategically placed high-abrasion rubber zones on the outsole to reduce weight
Weight: 250 g
Drop: 5 mm
Details:
Lightweight mesh upper for maximum breathability
Meta-Rocker technology for smoother running
Full-compression EVA midsole provides excellent protection
Outsole designed for smooth and stable ride and full ground contact
Strategically placed high-abrasion rubber zones on the outsole to reduce weight
Specifications are collected from official manufacturer websites. Please verify the specifications before proceeding with your final purchase. If you notice any problem you can
report it here.
I noticed a small wear at the bottom of the shoe on the sole. It looks like pieces are coming off. It hasn't affected the shoe's performance but it has raised concerns for me regarding the quality of construction and durability. So far, after three months of daily use, it has kept me satisfied.
Very good for what it is. Training shoe, relatively slow, ideal for long runs and very spacious in the toe area. Particularly stable and medium to good grip. In terms of durability, average but even with many kilometers on it and a quite worn sole, it has good cushioning.
In April 22, I timidly started running with Pegasus 38. The next purchases were Clifton 9, Arahi 8, Asics Novablast 3 & Nimbus 25. Today I return again to Clifton 9 while the others were great shoes. Long story short: for those who run for their soul, who enjoy long easy runs at 06:00 - 06:30, they are just perfect. Definitely not for tempo. For that, superblast. Fair for the money but still whatever suits each of us.
I had gotten the Clifton 8 for a season, an amazing shoe, I had them for 1.5 years and they are still sitting on the side. I got the Clifton 9 four months ago and already at the bottom pieces have started to come off and the fabric on top has torn. I accept that I work 12 hours every day, but it's a shame that the Clifton 8 worked out very well for me and the 9 are garbage. Stay away
I did not expect that after so many positive reviews it would be a shoe that you can't wear for more than 3 hours. I work in service and even the Puma Cat shoes, which are flat, are more comfortable on my feet. These shoes, after 2-3 hours, start hurting you everywhere. Light shoe, but not as they present it, that it is top and you can run for 700 hours straight. Stay away
The shoe is excellent in cushioning, thanks to its thick and soft material sole. You feel like you have springs pushing you upwards with every step. The only negative is that the foot gets a little warmer during use. The reason is that the fabric is very dense on the upper part and the foot does not breathe very well. I think it is one of the best shoes on the market.
I bought them mainly because of the plantar fasciitis that has been bothering me for 6-7 months. According to the orthopedist, a good pair of athletic shoes would help me a lot because the previous ones seemed to burden me quite a bit.
My physiotherapist suggested that I try 3 running shoes. The Clifton 9, the Saucony Endorphin Speed 3, and the Brooks Glycerin.
I tried the Clifton 9 and since the other two were not available in my size that day, and I liked how they felt, I bought them and wore them right away. After about half an hour of walking, I started to have intense discomfort (almost pain) in my right arch, and it was starting to bother my left arch as well. I also read the reviews here and on Reddit about many cases of the same problem and realized that in a flat arch like mine, it puts a lot of pressure on the arch. Overall, it seems to be a really good shoe with a good sole, so if you don't have a flat arch, it might be perfect, otherwise, you should try it out a bit.
In the end, I returned them and bought the Brooks Glycerin, which really suited me very well.
One of the worst shoes I have ever worn. I bought them for orthopedic reasons and hours of work and I had heard very good comments. My experience is that they destroyed my feet with blisters and calluses. ☹️
It's not a hidden gem, it's a disappointment. So many positive reviews, maybe from users in the first week, but it can't be explained otherwise. After 3 months, there are tears on the sides and back inside the heel. The bottom looks like I've had them for 2 years, excessive wear for no reason. Unacceptable for the price, even if they were priced at 60€, I mean, only 3 months of life? Unacceptable, stay away
Reading the reviews, I really wonder if you guys have tried other shoes. No offense. These specific ones are widely considered by the company itself as some of the most unsuccessful models. They took the 8, which was a decent shoe, and ruined it.
I suggest anyone who thinks it's good to try the Nimbus 25/26 to understand how an easy running shoe should be.
Steady value the Glifton. After 26 years of amateur running and having literally worn everything, for me it is perhaps the Best and most honest shoe. Lightweight, soft, with very good shock absorption. A shoe for over 800 kilometers. Of course, it is not for explosive speeds, but for many comfortable kilometers. I have worn all the Glifton shoes that have been released so far. I think the Glifton 9 is the Best of all. While they have added height, they have made it lighter and softer as needed so it is not boring.
The shoe seems to have more durability than the previous model, however it gives a heavier feeling during training, resulting in me personally having it as my last choice
Extremely athletic. I bought them for everyday use and specifically for my work. Well, the sneakers are not the best of their kind. Of course, because I happened to buy them at the same time as the ASICS NIMBUS 25, I have to say that the nimbus are far lighter and breathe better on the foot, but the Clifton has better material and I definitely won't face the problem that the asics have, which is to pierce the front part of the lining. Otherwise, I recommend it for someone who stands a lot at work and I agree with previous reviews that the foot "burns" after hours of use.
New review 29/06/2024: I tried them for running. Unfortunately, these specific sneakers are a bit "hard" and heavy. I will prefer to use them only for my work and for running I will remain faithful to asics and specifically to the NIMBUS 25 which I will definitely buy again or I may try the NIMBUS 26. Also, with light use, the sole has worn out. It is the first time I bought HOKA and probably the last.
Extremely. I used them in the context of rehabilitation after foot surgery and at the same time a problem in the other sole. The "break-in" was 30 minutes. Very soft to step on and very good arch support
Coming from a cement slab shoe (Asics Nimbus 24), I discovered that it is not a coincidence that this particular shoe gathers so many good reviews. I have been training for a 10k, running for about a month now, and I have already shaved off about 40 seconds from my time. It is a lightweight shoe, incredibly comfortable, I don't feel any road irregularities, it provides a stable footing, and it doesn't let the muscles around my calf suffer from continuous vibrations (which is very important for me as I am overweight). If someone does surges (sprints) there, they may not have a sense of foot strike and speed, but if that is just a part of their training, it can be managed. After all, they are distance shoes. The only downside might be that it doesn't breathe as well, and it might be a bit challenging in the summer. As for durability and wear over time, especially for running shoes, they last up to 550-600 kilometers in total, after that everything inside the sole (midsole, etc.) starts to wear out, and no matter what kind of shoe it is, it needs replacement. So, for someone who runs regularly, we are talking about durability of up to a year, regardless of external wear.
Guys, the shoes are incredible, I wear them all day at work and during my afternoon workout, which involves quite a bit of walking or running. I gave them 4 stars instead of 5 because they have a sensitivity in the sole, which is very soft and easily leaves marks. These shoes are recommended only for smooth surfaces and not for rough terrain, rocks, etc. I would easily buy them again without a second thought.
After wearing them for a month, the shoe is excellent for everyday use with good posture at work. Coming from Kayano 29, I have to say that the shoe has nothing to envy. As for durability, time will tell.
Very comfortable and lightweight shoes, with a soft sole and a fantastic feeling while walking. I also have the Clifton 9 GTX with Gore-Tex membrane, but in those, the sole is harder. Also, in the GTX version, their fabric doesn't open as easily, it takes more time to mold to the shape of the foot.
I have tried many sports products over time and I liked the design and colors of these specific ones. I hope they will withstand the test of time, but only time will tell. They have stability and I would say that I would prefer them again with Cairo as soon as I put them on
Fantastic shoes, not only for running but also for everyday walking as I use them. Comfortable, lightweight, and the size for me was the same as all my other shoes. They don't hurt at all. I would definitely buy them again comfortably!
For 8-10 km fast walking, they are satisfactory. Above that (15-25 km), it's something else... it lights up the leg, hits toes and heels (causing blisters and swelling when wearing expensive quality running socks). Overpriced... a fashion statement at the gym, for a walk to the café, and for shopping at stores.
Effective options are Saucony Triumph 21 or Asics Nimbus 25.
Honestly, the best shoe I have ever worn! I found them a few months ago on sale for 75 euros and decided to give them a chance. I use them both on a daily basis and for walking/running. Don't even think about it, in my opinion. I will conclude with the word worth it!!!
I was given this specific athletic shoe as a gift, and after wearing it for only two months for walking, as I had another training shoe, I decided to try it out. Compared to the 8, they improved the area that hits your arch, so we're talking about progress. It is incredibly lightweight and comfortable, and for slow runs, it is stable and has enough cushioning. When I tested it by applying pressure, it responded better than other similar models, maybe due to its weight. However, it has a limit and won't help you more beyond that. So, for everyday runs or light and long runs, it is definitely recommended. For interval races, if you want something more, you should go for other models that are now abundant in all brands. One negative aspect is definitely the wear on the outsole. I uploaded the photo to show how it has worn out on the left heel of the Clifton after 500 km, compared to the glycerin after 1000 km. Okay, maybe I am comparing the most sensitive with the most durable model, but it is a serious factor. It is worth noting that the Hoka still feels fresh, while the glycerin fades away. It has a low drop, which is rare, and a reasonable price, especially now that everything is expensive. Of course, it lacks durability, but it is definitely worth it for what it offers. We can't have it all.
Something I noticed afterwards is the difference in heart rate. The shoe makes it difficult to maintain a fast pace, and this is evident immediately. To write this, I intentionally tested it on the same terrain with similar paces, and with the Clifton, my heart rate was at least 10 beats higher. I don't know if it's due to the shoe's geometry or the absence of a plate, even a nylon one. The other two models are the On Cloud Eclipse and the Endorphin Speed 3.